Though the transition period from IPv4 to IPv6 is going to last for a
long time in which both protocols will coexist, we shouldn’t forget
that the final goal of IPv6 is to completely replace IPv4.
The best way to gain more experience with the new intricacies and
challenges of IPv6 is to test IPv6-based services in the presence of
IPv4 as well in a pure IPv6 environment.
The purpose of this lab is to test redistribution between IPv6 routing protocols in an exclusively IPv6 environment.
So I am following exactly the same scenario as the previous post about IPv4 redistribution and I will point out some particularities related to IPv6.
I will start by the problematic design of redistribution from one
routing domain into another with lower (better) administrative distance.
If you are not familiar with routing redistribution I strongly recommend you to take a look at the previous post.
Redistribution from one routing domain into another with lower (better) administrative distance:
All the following topologies are subject to the same concept:
As an example, I picked up the case where the source routing domain is EIGRP (internal prefix AD =90 and external prefix AD = 170) and the destination domain is OSPF with a better AD of 110.
Picture 1: Lab High level design


Lab content:
1- Redistribution2- Test connectivity from the BR R1
3- Solutions to overcome suboptimal paths
3.1- Control paths by controlling the redistribution at the border routers
3.2- Change the AD per-prefixes
3.3- Filter prefixes from IGPs into the routing table using inbound distribute-list
3.4- Prefix summarization
4- Troubleshooting notes5- Conclusion
1- Redistribution
ipv6 router eigrp 123 |
0 comments:
Post a Comment